Sibel…you might want to get a better grasp on how to keep the fools at bay…

His upcoming book will be released very soon. The book deals mainly with general FBI fraud, waste, abuse…How much of this will be there? Not much: it had to go to prepub review…as you know the bureau is notorious in using it's black marker to redact;-)

What’s the story the on John Cole interview; can we get the rest of it soon? Doesn’t SA Cole have a book in the works?

Best,
KF

I think I've been hyper-consistent. Some facts must be true, all the interpretations are wrong.

Nothing indicates illegality.

Keep on Keeping-on Sibel – and thanks!

Dennis

Dear Sibel Edmonds,

In note that the Murdoch Press in Australia has not breathed a word aboout your revelations. Check out this Google News search.

So much for their posturing on behalf of whistleblowers in this country. I think we can gauge how an Australian whistleblower who truly threatened corrupt powerful vested interests in this country would be treated by the Murdoch Press from their silence about you over their and over here.

More Murdoch Press posturing on "Your Right to Know" can be found here and here. Can't find that much on line from more recent times although ther

Some of my own modest efforts to get the truth out can be found at candobetter.org/911truth.

Also, there are plenty following you with keen interest at 911oz.com.

I hope you at least consider standing for Congress (although, I don't think even becoming President of the United States would be sufficient honour, in your case).

I've been following your story since it went public. Your courage is so inspiring! How can we help you?

JoeKY

I hope you keep your composure as you fight your way thru this.

As for me, I've tried lots of times to contact various Congresspoeple on different issues. And after a certain point I just said enough. The last time I called a Senator's office, the aide sounded like she was reading a press release. I thought, if you do this to everyone who calls you, no wonder Congress's approval rating is so low. If I did that in my job, I'd be out in no time. But in govt. everyday reality doesn't apply? Apparently not (from the way you're being treated).

Stay strong,
T

You believe most of Sibel's allegations even though you don't think they're true? Is this an example of cognitive dissonance or merely a simple case of psychosis?

Sibel never said that Gulen was Maskhadov or that Grossman was Ceku. If you had read AmCon carefully, which you obviously didn't, you would not have made such a statement.

Now maybe you should run along and read the interview carefully, and listen to Giraldi and Lauria, instead of trying to twist these things to fit your agenda.

So many are corrupt that this is business as usual – painting a narrative we all can make money off of.

Sh*t happens, enemies are there to conquer and kill, they hate our freedom and want our wealth, don't rick the boat and we can all (inside the beltway) and in the various "xxx industrial complexes" make out making America great.

Fer godsake don't rock the boat and spoil the party and just get with the program or you two can wear cement boots or have your plane crash.

did Luther have to argue MIHOP?

One reason that others in government are loathe to shed light on corruption, is because most are tainted by it or their close friends and those held in high esteem by the public.

Imagine if exposing the corruption was coupled with accountability. The US government would probably "fall". I mean should probably.

We've seen that there is no serious consequences to most wrong doing in high places. One person takes a hit, he opens his mouth and snitches. Omerta my friend. Omerta.

Sibel is a pesky truth teller and it's embarrassing them.

Thanks for the acknowledgment and welcome. I've been mostly following this (and occasionally posting) over at bradblog. But hey, why not go straight to the (substitute-your-favorite-animal-if-you-don't-appreciate-)horse's mouth? I've also been posting here and there in other sites' comments sections to direct attention over there and to AmCon, and discussing it with some people at work.

Incredible…all you do, and a 14 mo to boot! I tried to skip all that by adopting a 3 yo. Different issues is all

Curious if you can shed any more light on "This is a can of worm for some in congress, and not in a partisan way." And also, how do you know that Schakowsky aids "have been busy posting in the web/blogs?" Are they identifying themselves as such? Thanks.

http://news.rutgers.edu/medrel/news-releases/2009/09/new-book-by-dean-joh-20090908

Your steely calm must scare the hell out of them!!

S

You are either completely mad or the bravest woman on planet earth! My best hope for you right now is that the congresswoman is completely innocent, has been victimized and now will join you in uncovering the debacle.

Like many, I've been reading these stories with a dropped jaw and can't believe it when they don't appear in the mainstream. Publication of them would restore the newspaper industry big time.

Do you think that the others who are implicated are cowering behind Jan's strongarming you, in the hope that if she discredits you and your testimony, they will be spared the exposure?

In other words, is Schakowsky the thumb in the dike (pun not intended), and if she falls, they all will?

JCarb: I was contacted by their office a few weeks ago. I owe them a call. I will do that this coming Monday.

MMonk: And thank you for all your help disseminating this. BradBlog is waiting for their response that.

n69n: Welcome, and hope to see you here regularly. I set up this blog to cover the macro issues of interest…then, this case opened up again via 'Schmidt v. Krikorian' case. In a few days we'll be covering our other issues and my series: The Makings of a Police State.'

Tom Joad: I wish I could be that optimistic. 8 years…feels like a life time.

Metemneurosis: Thank you. I just found out about the link. I will fix the link to a brief section…and next week I'll release the full interview (Boiling Frogs).

Simon: I was really shocked; the response was so unlike what she's been known for…very ugly. BradBlog is waiting for their response to this letter.

Sander O: Thanks.

P.W.: Thank you for your encouraging words and support. I've done that: Grassley, Leahy, Waxman. This is a can of worm for some in congress, and not in a partisan way.

Doug: Thank you.

Cosimo diRondo: Is this your first comment here? First visit? If yes, welcome.

Bluesky: Many thanks. I am sure Rep.Schakowsky will get to read this. If not her, her aids/staff. They have been busy posting in the web/blogs.

T: It is not only the MSM. Many major blogs with 'agenda' and 'agenda-driven funding' and 'unconditional loyalty to Israel'

…

I will be back to post additional comments. I have to feed my 14 mo girl. She's been teething again: number 10-11, and that is tough!

Thank you all for all your support. To those first-timers here: Welcome.

Representative Murphy,

I am writing to get your response to the recent allegations made by an FBI whistle blower named Sibel Edmonds. She had been gagged since 2002 under the state secrets privilege from telling her story, but recently testified under oath in the Schmidt v. Krikorian case in Ohio. Also, see this week's interview with her published in the American Conservative:

http://www.amconmag.com/article/2009/nov/01/00006/

Her story has also been covered extensively by Brad Friedman at http://www.bradblog.com.

The allegations are stunning: high level government officials selling national security secrets to Turkish and Israeli agents over a number of years, and helping those entities infiltrate U.S. nuclear laboratories. And these are only the worst of the many allegations she has made.

Edmonds has been deemed credible by everyone who has listened to her, including Senators Grassley and Leahy. And yet, there is no mainstream media coverage, and apparently nothing being done (or at least no public acknowledgment thereof) in Congress or the DoJ about this extremely serious matter.

Your web site says:

"I am proud to fight for openness and transparency in Washington, and I invite you to join my effort to restore accountability to Congress."

I can't think of a better way of demonstrating this than by pursuing these allegations and making an accounting to the American people. If Edmonds' allegations are true, then it seems some established members of congress are too compromised to be trusted with this responsibility.

I have lost all trust in my federal government due to the disappearance of the rule of law over the past several years. In my cynical view, only the most heinous crimes, perpetrated by the people in the highest halls of power, are the ones we seem to tolerate, seemingly for political expediency. My greatest fear in regards to the Edmonds allegations is that the crimes continue, and that the very nuclear secrets that have been sold have found their way into Iran and North Korea, and that our government is using precisely that as an excuse for more saber rattling and aggression towards those regimes, resulting in more human suffering, misery, and endless feeding of the military industrial complex.

Please follow up on this, in a very public way.

Thanks you for your attention.

i have heard of your fight through different sites and forums, but i was not aware your had your own blog/site.

i must say im very proud and wish to express my support, much love and strenght to you.

Godspeed Sibel.

greetings from the netherlands.

Ok, so the Congresswoman is stupid. We knew that.

But, the gist of your letter Mrs. Edmonds, is wrongheaded.

Just because you are gagged, doesn't mean you are right, and the government wrong. An IG report, Mr. Cole, or Mr. X are meaningless.

You can try leveraging the gagging and the redacting as "credibility" but um…anyone above the 120 IQ threshold, will give you a polite smile. The Congresswoman, alas, like Schmit – well, no smiles there

So let's not confuse the fact that they are screaming, with the fact of you being right.

Now I obviously believe most of your allegations – but that says nothing about their veracity (again, threshold here). I just trust you. That you are evasive on sources – and you chose to ignore my questions to your AmCon revelations – is a revelation of its own kind.

No doubt you are a hero, and a truculent Anatolian, but who's paying the piper, and what dance are you dancing. Gulen is not Mashkadov. Grossman is not Ceku. You claim otherwise – so does Chossudovsky. He's a crackpot. Do you really want to be in his company?

So how about my questions. Please?

Janet Tavakoli videos

http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090925/OPINION/909250324/1029/OPINION03

This is one of my favorite parts:

Rep. Paul Hodes serves on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform which, according to the committee's website, "is the main investigative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives" and "has jurisdiction to investigate any federal program and any matter with federal policy implications." Surely these allegations fall under the committee's jurisdiction. We should expect to see prompt action.

Keep those letters to the editor coming, and contact your lawmakers here:

http://congress.org/stickers/?dir=congressorg&officials=1

You can find newspaper contacts from all over the country here:

http://www.usnpl.com

and don't forget the Talking Heads Email List here:

http://www.hereinreality.com/heads.html

Fight the Good Fight!

Good for you for maintaining a calm approach as you deal with Schakowsky.

As for the MSM avoding this, I'm wondering. Who's going to give in first and finally cover this? Because at some point they can't avoid it anymore. Eventually somebody covers it and it's "officially" news (whatever that means).

I just read your American Conservative article last night, and when I read the story about Congresswoman Schakowsky, my first thought was how is she going to respond? She obviously is no American patriot. Instead of doing what is right to protect the American people, she ridicules and smears a true patriot who is relentlessly fighting to expose the deep rooted corruption of our government. America will not survive if the rule of law is not re-established in this country. We have been ruled by criminals and cowards for too long. If she does not respond properly to your very professional letter, then she is committing treason against the American people. I will continue to expose her on my blog until she comes clean. This corruption has got to end or humanity will not survive.

Bless you Sibel.

Message to Congresswoman Schakowsky:
It's time to come clean Congresswoman Schakowsky. You have nothing to lose by doing so. Protecting your image is not worth the price each and every American is paying at the hands of these criminals. You do not deserve the privileged position you are in if you don't stand on the side of justice. Enough is enough. If you don't come clean we will expose you for what you are.

Sibel, you are an inspiration.

Doug

About that "documentation to prove the files existence" I am curious if you would consider delivering it to the "Representative"?

Is it something you could publish here? Could you get in trouble for doing so or just for having it?

Also I, like Sander feel, although taking AIPAC and asociates down would be a great boon to our planet, the bigger fish to fry is 9/11…the Mother Lode.

Knowing you testified to the commission(I think it was for 3 hours or so) is it possible that transcript can ever be recovered from the bowels of the secret dungeon. Do you have a copy?

I understand you are in a delicate position and the way you have handle disclosures so far has been masterful and hints at a master plan, all in due time etc….just wondering.

All the good people in the world thank you, even if most don't consciously know it yet. Together we will see a better world.

Shakowsky is scared.
She is lashing out.

On a related matter, I am an architect and involved with Architects and Engineers for 911Truth – AE911truth.org and we would like to meet with you and work for our mutual interest in revealing the truth.

As you may recall, my college roommate who is Turkish Dr, Erdem Cantkein was also a whistle blower who fought the drug companies and the University of Pittsburgh who were both lying, falsifying data and effectively supporting the effort in selling ineffective medicine to supposedly treat 10s of millions of children.

I would like to arrange contact between you and AE911Truth.org, which has over 850 architects and engineers from this nation who support the call for a new investigation into the events of 9/11. Please contact me to facilitate a meeting at your convenience.

Thank you so much for what you are doing. All I can say is that we are thousands and thousands and we have your back.

Jeffrey

Simon

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

You are going to win, Sibel.

Best Regards,
"Tom Joad"

Now we watch obfuscation process from Schakowsky begin. 10 to 1 debate from her office will not engage ANY of the facts you presented. Will be ignored or ad hominem[psychotic nobody]

So many situations presented through this site and others discussing control of information or sufferance of due process by 'vested interest'elected high officialdom 'at the door' are met the exact same way #deny#denigrate#ignore#threaten#physical removal. It is a method. You have the facts and they have run out of hiding places.
rem

I didn't know that you had a b log, or I would've been here supporting you all the time!

all warmth,
Norn

You are a psychotic nobody.

Dennis:Thanks, and I hope so. You know I've never been attacked by anyone like this before. As I've said she's done some good work, and I am sad to see her diminish herself this way.Mizgin will have some interesting observation; we'll have the piece in the next 1-2 days.

Thanks once again!
Dennis

Aine: She issued these public statements (basically name calling) to BradBlog and summoned her aids to work certain blogs…This is even worse than Mr. Hastert's office attack…"Liar, not credible, with teabaggers & truthers who are conspiracy theorists, fantasist,…'

Basically, very unprofessional, uninformed and irrational.

Coming Up Next: a solid and as usual well-researched piece by Mizgin on this topic. Also a great toon by Paul Jamiol.

It's very sad (and disheartening) to read all the attacks and name-calling from Ms. Schakowsky's office. She's done some good work, and instead of emgaging in these vicious attacks she should use her position (as it is her duty)to call for a hearing…

Thank you.

Good post.

Regards!