<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast Show #8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/</link>
	<description>Politics, Civil Liberties, Media, Editorial, Activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:47:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arealjeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>arealjeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-4106</guid>
		<description>Sibel, thanks for clarifying this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sibel, thanks for clarifying this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesLaffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesLaffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>I know this thread is dead. But for the occasional person foraging through old posts -- as I have been doing for the last few days -- this interview with John Cole is worth a listen. 

The info provided by Sibel, John Cole, and Peter Collins is important. And a few bits are things I don&#039;t remember reading nor listening to elsewhere.

Finally, it&#039;s interesting that John Cole seems to not see the big picture, despite Sibel and Peter tactfully nudging him. He says he still can&#039;t figure out why the FBI hired Hadiya Roberts. (As I recall from what Sibel said and wrote: Hadiya Roberts is the Pakistani FBI translator who worked in the same office as Sibel and whose father, a Pakistani general, worked for ISI general Mahmood. Mahmood wired $100,000 to 9/11 terrorist Atta shortly before the attacks of 9/11.) Of course, John Cole is still working for the government, the Pentagon, so perhaps he has to feign ignorance.

If John Cole doesn&#039;t see the big picture -- the Deep State, as Sibel has stated -- I hope he WILL see the big picture. We need him. Maybe he needs some more time to research and think these things through before reaching sequential &quot;I Get It!&quot; moments. That&#039;s what I had to do, which was early 2009, as I realized I&#039;d been duped by Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this thread is dead. But for the occasional person foraging through old posts &#8212; as I have been doing for the last few days &#8212; this interview with John Cole is worth a listen. </p>
<p>The info provided by Sibel, John Cole, and Peter Collins is important. And a few bits are things I don&#8217;t remember reading nor listening to elsewhere.</p>
<p>Finally, it&#8217;s interesting that John Cole seems to not see the big picture, despite Sibel and Peter tactfully nudging him. He says he still can&#8217;t figure out why the FBI hired Hadiya Roberts. (As I recall from what Sibel said and wrote: Hadiya Roberts is the Pakistani FBI translator who worked in the same office as Sibel and whose father, a Pakistani general, worked for ISI general Mahmood. Mahmood wired $100,000 to 9/11 terrorist Atta shortly before the attacks of 9/11.) Of course, John Cole is still working for the government, the Pentagon, so perhaps he has to feign ignorance.</p>
<p>If John Cole doesn&#8217;t see the big picture &#8212; the Deep State, as Sibel has stated &#8212; I hope he WILL see the big picture. We need him. Maybe he needs some more time to research and think these things through before reaching sequential &#8220;I Get It!&#8221; moments. That&#8217;s what I had to do, which was early 2009, as I realized I&#8217;d been duped by Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRF</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>JRF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>@ Simon

Very well said.

In regards to Mahmood wiring the money...even if there is no &quot;smoking gun&quot; document (or at least that hasn&#039;t been uncovered), it is clear that the ISI was involved in dishing out the money the US was giving to fund the mujahadeen during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.  Given the history of the CIA and other intelligence agencies, it is certainly plausible, if not likely, that the ISI (with Mahmood playing a direct role, if not the one actually wiring the money) would be involved in the $100,000 transfer to Atta.  Also, I have every reason to believe that Grossman, and many others, were double agents while working at high levels in the US government.  It seems as if there is an entire network involved here, albeit a rather nebulous one.  Certain individuals in high ranking positions in governments (ie. Grossman) use their connections, access to information, privileges, high level clearances, ect. as a commodity, trading their access, information, privilege,ect. for money to other foreign governments, who then use that information and possibly re-sell it, alter it, or pass it on (maybe even to confuse their customer or for dubious reasons).  From the sounds of it, this enterprise, at least relating to Afghanistan (and I have every reason to believe South American countries as well), is also engaged in drug smuggling, weapons contracting/distribution, and possibly other illegal activities.  It&#039;s an extraordinarily complex networks of individuals, corporations, and possibly elements of governments, and the fact that there is absolutely no oversight of much of what intelligence agencies do is none to reassuring.  

By the way Sibel, I completely forgot that Grossman met with Mahmood in DC the day before 9/11, but remember it being discussed in one of the podcasts.  Where was this reported?  Who asked them what the meeting was about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Simon</p>
<p>Very well said.</p>
<p>In regards to Mahmood wiring the money&#8230;even if there is no &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; document (or at least that hasn&#8217;t been uncovered), it is clear that the ISI was involved in dishing out the money the US was giving to fund the mujahadeen during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.  Given the history of the CIA and other intelligence agencies, it is certainly plausible, if not likely, that the ISI (with Mahmood playing a direct role, if not the one actually wiring the money) would be involved in the $100,000 transfer to Atta.  Also, I have every reason to believe that Grossman, and many others, were double agents while working at high levels in the US government.  It seems as if there is an entire network involved here, albeit a rather nebulous one.  Certain individuals in high ranking positions in governments (ie. Grossman) use their connections, access to information, privileges, high level clearances, ect. as a commodity, trading their access, information, privilege,ect. for money to other foreign governments, who then use that information and possibly re-sell it, alter it, or pass it on (maybe even to confuse their customer or for dubious reasons).  From the sounds of it, this enterprise, at least relating to Afghanistan (and I have every reason to believe South American countries as well), is also engaged in drug smuggling, weapons contracting/distribution, and possibly other illegal activities.  It&#8217;s an extraordinarily complex networks of individuals, corporations, and possibly elements of governments, and the fact that there is absolutely no oversight of much of what intelligence agencies do is none to reassuring.  </p>
<p>By the way Sibel, I completely forgot that Grossman met with Mahmood in DC the day before 9/11, but remember it being discussed in one of the podcasts.  Where was this reported?  Who asked them what the meeting was about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIBEL EDMONDS LAUNCHES NEW WEBSITE &#171; Rastî</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2922</link>
		<dc:creator>SIBEL EDMONDS LAUNCHES NEW WEBSITE &#171; Rastî</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2922</guid>
		<description>[...] Last Friday Sibel posted her most recent podcast with Peter B. Collins, which was an interview with former FBI counter-intelligence officer John Cole. [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (72.233.96.143) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (72.233.2.59) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last Friday Sibel posted her most recent podcast with Peter B. Collins, which was an interview with former FBI counter-intelligence officer John Cole. [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (72.233.96.143) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (72.233.2.59) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sibel Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>Sibel Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>Miguel &amp; Metem: You are right. Known undisputed facts: Grossman worked in US Embassy in Pakistan during the critical years (1979 to early 80s). 2- Grossman was very close to ISI General Mahmood. 3- Grossman was meeting with Mahmood in DC one day prior to Sep. 11; neither would say what the meeting was about.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hadiya Roberts (The Pakistani Translator-FBI): her father (General, also under Mahmood)worked for Mahmood. ISI was being monitored by the bureau (Pak. Mil. Attache&#039; in DC). Mahmood: primary target.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the wire: you are right. As far as I know the smoking gun/document is not there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&#039;d think many journalists would chase this angle; right?! Just to prove it: false or true...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miguel &amp; Metem: You are right. Known undisputed facts: Grossman worked in US Embassy in Pakistan during the critical years (1979 to early 80s). 2- Grossman was very close to ISI General Mahmood. 3- Grossman was meeting with Mahmood in DC one day prior to Sep. 11; neither would say what the meeting was about.</p>
<p>Hadiya Roberts (The Pakistani Translator-FBI): her father (General, also under Mahmood)worked for Mahmood. ISI was being monitored by the bureau (Pak. Mil. Attache&#39; in DC). Mahmood: primary target.</p>
<p>As for the wire: you are right. As far as I know the smoking gun/document is not there.</p>
<p>You&#39;d think many journalists would chase this angle; right?! Just to prove it: false or true&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metem</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2548</link>
		<dc:creator>Metem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2548</guid>
		<description>@ Miguel &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Go to History Commons and search Mahmud Ahmed.  Or use the search term &quot;$100,000&quot;, or &quot;wired AND Atta&quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.historycommons.org/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&#039;ll get plenty of sources for quotes regarding money wired to Atta on multiple occasions.  It appears pretty certain that Ahmed Saeed Sheikh wired some of these. He is known to be ISI.  There are, I believe, several sources that suggest General Ahmed may have ordered some of the wires but you&#039;re correct that there is no source that says &#039;yes it&#039;s a fact&#039;.  Nevertheless with multiple, multiple wires coming through Dubai traced back to Pakistan and known ISI agents it seems fairly certain someone high up in ISI knew about this.  I see no real reason to doubt Ahmed especially given that, I believe, he &#039;retired&#039; not long after all this came out.  But even if it wasn&#039;t him it was someone within ISI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Miguel </p>
<p>Go to History Commons and search Mahmud Ahmed.  Or use the search term &quot;$100,000&quot;, or &quot;wired AND Atta&quot;.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.historycommons.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.historycommons.org/</a></p>
<p>You&#39;ll get plenty of sources for quotes regarding money wired to Atta on multiple occasions.  It appears pretty certain that Ahmed Saeed Sheikh wired some of these. He is known to be ISI.  There are, I believe, several sources that suggest General Ahmed may have ordered some of the wires but you&#39;re correct that there is no source that says &#39;yes it&#39;s a fact&#39;.  Nevertheless with multiple, multiple wires coming through Dubai traced back to Pakistan and known ISI agents it seems fairly certain someone high up in ISI knew about this.  I see no real reason to doubt Ahmed especially given that, I believe, he &#39;retired&#39; not long after all this came out.  But even if it wasn&#39;t him it was someone within ISI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Medeiros</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2547</link>
		<dc:creator>John Medeiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2547</guid>
		<description>@ SanderO&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interesting Email message.  How did you come upon it, were you copied on the message sent by Mr. McCampbell, PE to the Washington.field@ic.fbi.gov office? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you expect the FBI to follow through with an investigation and reply back to Mr. McCampbell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ SanderO</p>
<p>Interesting Email message.  How did you come upon it, were you copied on the message sent by Mr. McCampbell, PE to the <a href="mailto:Washington.field@ic.fbi.gov">Washington.field@ic.fbi.gov</a> office? </p>
<p>Do you expect the FBI to follow through with an investigation and reply back to Mr. McCampbell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve listened to the first 40 minutes of the interview and plan to listen to the rest when I get the chance.  But if you don&#039;t mind, could you refresh my memory on the Pakistani general wiring $100,000 to Mohammed Atta?  If I recall, that was a thinly sourced story coming from an Indian newspaper, and it seems that one of your other guests (Peter Lance?) downplayed that story.  But both you and John seem to indicate that it is in fact true.  Is this something you both have from your FBI sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve listened to the first 40 minutes of the interview and plan to listen to the rest when I get the chance.  But if you don&#39;t mind, could you refresh my memory on the Pakistani general wiring $100,000 to Mohammed Atta?  If I recall, that was a thinly sourced story coming from an Indian newspaper, and it seems that one of your other guests (Peter Lance?) downplayed that story.  But both you and John seem to indicate that it is in fact true.  Is this something you both have from your FBI sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>The key question: Why would FBI headquarters impede al Qaeda investigations? Some journalists have suggested risk aversion. IMO this is nonsense. What is risky about preventing a terrorist attack? One would think that failing to prevent a terrorist attack would be a bad career move, except as noted in the interview this failure didn&#039;t hurt anyone&#039;s career. Bizarre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Gorelick wall wasn&#039;t in fact applicable. The search for al-Hazmi and al-Midhar should have been a sub-file under the existing USS Cole criminal case. Yet we have &quot;risk aversion&quot; by the UBLU agents who made sure the case remained on the intel side. Lawrence Wright notes that agent Soufan repeatedly requested information on the Malaysia al Qaeda meeting. It wasn&#039;t turned over until after 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key question: Why would FBI headquarters impede al Qaeda investigations? Some journalists have suggested risk aversion. IMO this is nonsense. What is risky about preventing a terrorist attack? One would think that failing to prevent a terrorist attack would be a bad career move, except as noted in the interview this failure didn&#39;t hurt anyone&#39;s career. Bizarre.</p>
<p>The Gorelick wall wasn&#39;t in fact applicable. The search for al-Hazmi and al-Midhar should have been a sub-file under the existing USS Cole criminal case. Yet we have &quot;risk aversion&quot; by the UBLU agents who made sure the case remained on the intel side. Lawrence Wright notes that agent Soufan repeatedly requested information on the Malaysia al Qaeda meeting. It wasn&#39;t turned over until after 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishmael</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishmael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>Gee! Kinda makes this series, being rebroadcast on IFC, rather prescient, Don&#039;t you think?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14eUKogPF7s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Where Am I?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the Village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;what do you want?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whose side are you on?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be telling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We want information...information...information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You won&#039;t get it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By hook or by crook, WE WILL.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who are you?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The New Number 2.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who is Number 1.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;YOU are Number 6.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am NOT a NUMBER. I AM A FREE MAN.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[makes the ok sign over the right eye and salutes]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Be Seeing You.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/5082/no6badgeff4.gif&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee! Kinda makes this series, being rebroadcast on IFC, rather prescient, Don&#39;t you think?</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14eUKogPF7s</a></p>
<p><b>Where Am I?</p>
<p>In the Village.</p>
<p>what do you want?</p>
<p>Information.</p>
<p>Whose side are you on?</p>
<p>That would be telling.</p>
<p>We want information&#8230;information&#8230;information.</p>
<p>You won&#39;t get it.</p>
<p>By hook or by crook, WE WILL.</p>
<p>Who are you?</p>
<p>The New Number 2.</p>
<p>Who is Number 1.</p>
<p>YOU are Number 6.</p>
<p>I am NOT a NUMBER. I AM A FREE MAN.</b></p>
<p>[makes the ok sign over the right eye and salutes]</p>
<p>Be Seeing You.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow">http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/5082/no6badgeff4.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Proud Primate</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>The Proud Primate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>prima facie (ablative singular)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prima facie (ablative singular)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanderO</title>
		<link>http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/comment-page-1/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>SanderO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2009/10/16/podcast-show-8/#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something of interest:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From: &quot;Rich McCampbell&quot;&lt;br /&gt;Rich.McCampbell@crbusa.com&lt;br /&gt;Date: October 16, 2009 4:45:23 PM PDT&lt;br /&gt;To: washington.field@ic.fbi.gov&lt;br /&gt;Cc: Boston@ic.fbi.gov&lt;br /&gt;Subject: FBI to Review Evidence of 9-11-01 Explosives&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dear FBI – WFO,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I’m a member of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth [ae911truth.org] and am following-up on a statement made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach that the FBI will review the evidence presented by ae911truth.org. That evidence indicates that military-grade demolition explosive nanothermite was detected in four dust samples from the collapsed World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7. Director Heimbach was quoted in the attached Silicon Valley Metro newspaper.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I give thanks to Deputy Director Heimbach and the FBI’s courageous action in this matter, the largest crime in US history. In these times of universal deceit I am very grateful for honest men like Deputy Director Heimbach and wish the FBI all success in following through on their review of the evidence [originally presented in a peer-reviewed paper published in the “Open Chemical Physics Journal”, Volume 2, ISSN: 1874-4125, which I’m very happy to send you a copy of the paper if you haven’t read it yet].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The presence of thermite explosives in WTC dust is prima fascia evidence of US involvement in the WTC Towers collapses on 9-11-01. Per the legal requirements of Title 18 Section 2382 of the United States Code I hereby am reporting apparent acts of treason by entities within our own country and possibly within the US Military.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, thank you for your efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;May the truth of 9-11-01 lead to greater justice in the US and the world,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rich McCampbell, PE&lt;br /&gt;CRB Consulting Engineers, Inc.&lt;br /&gt;1 Kendall Square Ste B17001&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;visit AE911Truth.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s something of interest:</p>
<p>From: &quot;Rich McCampbell&quot;<br /><a href="mailto:Rich.McCampbell@crbusa.com">Rich.McCampbell@crbusa.com</a><br />Date: October 16, 2009 4:45:23 PM PDT<br />To: <a href="mailto:washington.field@ic.fbi.gov">washington.field@ic.fbi.gov</a><br />Cc: <a href="mailto:Boston@ic.fbi.gov">Boston@ic.fbi.gov</a><br />Subject: FBI to Review Evidence of 9-11-01 Explosives</p>
<p>Dear FBI – WFO,</p>
<p>I’m a member of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth [ae911truth.org] and am following-up on a statement made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Deputy Director Michael J. Heimbach that the FBI will review the evidence presented by ae911truth.org. That evidence indicates that military-grade demolition explosive nanothermite was detected in four dust samples from the collapsed World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7. Director Heimbach was quoted in the attached Silicon Valley Metro newspaper.</p>
<p>I give thanks to Deputy Director Heimbach and the FBI’s courageous action in this matter, the largest crime in US history. In these times of universal deceit I am very grateful for honest men like Deputy Director Heimbach and wish the FBI all success in following through on their review of the evidence [originally presented in a peer-reviewed paper published in the “Open Chemical Physics Journal”, Volume 2, ISSN: 1874-4125, which I’m very happy to send you a copy of the paper if you haven’t read it yet].</p>
<p>The presence of thermite explosives in WTC dust is prima fascia evidence of US involvement in the WTC Towers collapses on 9-11-01. Per the legal requirements of Title 18 Section 2382 of the United States Code I hereby am reporting apparent acts of treason by entities within our own country and possibly within the US Military.</p>
<p>Again, thank you for your efforts.</p>
<p>May the truth of 9-11-01 lead to greater justice in the US and the world,</p>
<p>Rich McCampbell, PE<br />CRB Consulting Engineers, Inc.<br />1 Kendall Square Ste B17001</p>
<p>visit AE911Truth.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
