Non-contact measurement of heart and respiration rates with a single-chip microwave doppler radar
http://transducers.stanford.edu/Publications/DroitcourThesis.html

A laser pen! Since when did they start using such advanced diagnostic tools?

And I can’t get an attorney, there is no conspiracy or coverup.
You decide.

Don’t those people take an Oath too?

Chris Hedges wrote an article several days ago asking why the political right has the loudest voice, while the left lacks leadership. Ron Paul had a single unifying message that anyone could understand; the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land. Stemming from that singular message are many corollaries, such as the legal war, legal immigration, and states’ rights, that were denied a venue at the Presidential debates.

The left vs. right scenario is a fabrication that serves to keep the electorate divided. Thomas Jefferson once said, “If I had to choose between government without newspapers, and newspapers without government, I wouldn’t hesitate to choose the latter.” Today, the U.S. is a corpocracy allowed to exist by an impotent fourth estate.

It’s kind of like the global meltdown. No accountability continues. And now there are even more books about this. The latest: Brian Ross’s new book about Madoff. I saw him on C-SPAN plugging it. And frankly it wasn’t much of a pitch to buy it. “There was much more than meets the eye with Madoff.” Not exactly an earth-shattering statement from ABC’s top investigative guy.

Since the MSM loves something outrageous to draw attention to an issue, how come more politicians (like Paul) don’t do this? We all know the usual responses:

You have to work within the system.
You have to give it time.
(The Pelosi Doctrine)First, we have the votes. Then we don’t. Then we do. You’re only the Speaker of the House. Is it that hard to keep track of this?

Why don’t the Democrats filibuster? Why don’t they let the neocons do it if they threaten to? The point is that the status quo of not rocking the system doesn’t work. Yet the other side of it is that nobody wants to lose their seat during this global meltdown.

At least this site is doing it’s part. So let’s keep working at it.

I am so glad you decided to write about Obama and John Yoo.

It is a Moral Outrage that the War Criminal, John Yoo, is being protected by the Obama Administration for his part in the TORTURING of an AMERICAN CITIZEN. I wonder how many citizens might be able to make similar claims of torture by our Govt. using clandestine methods that aren’t talked about openly, and if they are the people are discredited as being “mentally ill” even if they are not.
Might they use possible technological features as quoted in your other piece, Down the Police State Lane. In fact, I know they do – on a personal level.

Homeland Security Embarks on Big Brother Programs to Read Our Minds and Emotions. I think they’ve been perfecting this on me, remotely.

The “non-invasive” claim might be a bit of a stretch. A DHS report issued last December outlined some of the possible technological features of FAST, which include “a remote cardiovascular and respiratory sensor” to measure “heart rate, heart rate variability, respiration rate, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia,” a “remote eye tracker” that “uses a camera and processing software to track the position and gaze of the eyes (and, in some instances, the entire head),” “thermal cameras that provide detailed information on the changes in the thermal properties of the skin in the face,” and “a high resolution video that allows for highly detailed images of the face and body … and an audio system for analyzing human voice for pitch change.”

‘possible technological features’

you betcha’

And now even if I could get a lawyer, which I can’t and Lord knows I’ve tried, I would be unable to even bring a Suit to prosecute the people responsible for enacting the methods, many of them used on me that are in the Jose Padilla lawsuit. I am talking about years John Yoo, and YOU know it.

GO F YOURSELF YOO.

What they’re doing does seem invasive. From the way these people describe what they’re doing, the imprerssion that comes across is like they view the people as their property to do with as they will as though they’re the superiors and the people should be subordinate to them.

Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were “the only liquid investment capital” available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.

This will raise questions about crime’s influence on the economic system at times of crisis. It will also prompt further examination of the banking sector as world leaders, including Barack Obama and Gordon Brown, call for new International Monetary Fund regulations. Speaking from his office in Vienna, Costa said evidence that illegal money was being absorbed into the financial system was first drawn to his attention by intelligence agencies and prosecutors around 18 months ago. “In many instances, the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system’s main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor,” he said.

Some of the evidence put before his office indicated that gang money was used to save some banks from collapse when lending seized up, he said.

“Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities… There were signs that some banks were rescued that way.” Costa declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drugs money, saying that would be inappropriate because his office is supposed to address the problem, not apportion blame. But he said the money is now a part of the official system and had been effectively laundered.

“That was the moment [last year] when the system was basically paralysed because of the unwillingness of banks to lend money to one another. The progressive liquidisation to the system and the progressive improvement by some banks of their share values [has meant that] the problem [of illegal money] has become much less serious than it was,” he said.

The IMF estimated that large US and European banks lost more than $1tn on toxic assets and from bad loans from January 2007 to September 2009 and more than 200 mortgage lenders went bankrupt. Many major institutions either failed, were acquired under duress, or were subject to government takeover.
Rajeev Syal
The Observer, Sunday 13 December 2009

“Gangs are now believed to make most of their profits from the drugs trade and are estimated to be worth £352bn, the UN says. They have traditionally kept proceeds in cash or moved it offshore to hide it from the authorities. It is understood that evidence that drug money has flowed into banks came from officials in Britain, Switzerland, Italy and the US.

British bankers would want to see any evidence that Costa has to back his claims. A British Bankers’ Association spokesman said: “We have not been party to any regulatory dialogue that would support a theory of this kind. There was clearly a lack of liquidity in the system and to a large degree this was filled by the intervention of central banks.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

Wow

That link also led to these victims inside the matrix:

http://www.upi.com/video/Issue_of_the_Day/2009/12/11/reaction_gates_predicts_new_iran_sanctions/UPI-12605566029700/

Last login: Sat Dec 12 15:01:02 on console
You have mail.
icu:~ nick$ ping 4.2.2.2
PING 4.2.2.2 (4.2.2.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
^C
— 4.2.2.2 ping statistics —
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

That means my Comcast router was getting banged with requests from some computer (NSA_CIA) those pricks.

Dr Paul sounds real good. Hope he’s for real and believe it might be so. I believe his stance is for ending the CIA’s black market imposed on humanity known as “the war on drugs” as well as for ending their “control the currency of a nation and I care not who is president” racket.

“The prestige of government has undoubtedly been lowered considerably by the Prohibition law. For nothing is more destructive of respect for the government and the law of the land than passing laws which cannot be enforced. It is an open secret that the dangerous increase of crime in this country is closely connected with this.”
– Albert Einstein, My First Impression of the U.S.A., 1921

“Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you gain at one end you lose at the other. It’s like feeding a dog on his own tail. It won’t fatten the dog.” — Mark Twain, Speech 11/23/1900

ETHNIC CLEANSING

There’s Youtube footage on Congressional testimony by Gov. suits to Feingold where they admit that the “Patriot Act” is 99% of the time used against the civilian population in this country, specifically for their drug “revenue”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPVm6CZXOyc

These people will not give up power because they know they will be held accountable. Hope Dr Paul doesn’t go hang out with that other would be liberator:

After the embarrassing failure of the invasion, which never evoked the hoped-for spontaneous anti-Castro
insurrection, Kennedy fired Allen Dulles, his Harrimanite deputy Bissell, and CIA Deputy Director Charles Cabell (whose brother was the mayor of Dallas at the time Kennedy was shot).
During the days after the Bay of Pigs debacle, Kennedy was deeply suspicious of the intelligence community and of proposals for military escalation in general, including in places like South Vietnam. Kennedy
sought to procure an outside, expert opinion on military matters. For this he turned to the former commander in chief of the Southwest Pacific Theatre during World War II, General Douglas MacArthur. Almost ten years ago, a reliable source shared with one of the authors an account of a meeting between Kennedy and MacArthur in which the veteran general warned the young President that there were elements inside the U.S. government who emphatically did not share his patriotic motives, and who were seeking to destroy his administration from within. MacArthur warned that the forces bent on destroying Kennedy were centered in the Wall Street financial
community and its various tentacles in the intelligence community.
It is a matter of public record that Kennedy met with MacArthur in the latter part of April 1961, after the Bay of Pigs. According to Kennedy aide Theodore Sorenson, MacArthur told Kennedy, “The chickens are coming home to roost, and you happen to have just moved into the chicken house.” / Note #9 At the same meeting, according to Sorenson, MacArthur “warned [Kennedy] against the commitment of American foot soldiers on the Asian mainland, and the President never forgot this advice.” / Note #1 / Note #0 This point is
grudgingly confirmed by Arthur M. Schlesinger, a Kennedy aide who had a vested interest in vilifying MacArthur, who wrote that “MacArthur expressed his old view that anyone wanting to commit American ground forces to the mainland [of Asia] should have his head examined.” / Note #1 / Note #1
MacArthur restated this advice during a second meeting with Kennedy when
the General returned from his last trip to the Far East in July 1961.
Kennedy valued MacArthur’s professional military opinion highly, and used
it to keep at arms length those advisers who were arguing for escalation in
Laos, Vietnam, and elsewhere. He repeatedly invited those who proposed to
send land forces to Asia to convince MacArthur that this was a good idea.
If they could convince MacArthur, then he, Kennedy, might also go along.
At this time, the group proposing escalation in Vietnam (as well as
preparing the assassination of President Diem) had a heavy Brown Brothers
Harriman/Skull and Bones overtone: The hawks of 1961-63 were Harriman,
McGeorge Bundy, William Bundy, Henry Cabot Lodge, and some key London
oligarchs and theoreticians of counterinsurgency wars. And of course,
George Bush during these years was calling for escalation in Vietnam and
challenging Kennedy to “muster the courage” to try a second invasion of
Cuba.