Corbett Video Report Gladio Series: Who’s at the Top of the Pyramid?

In this sixth part of the ongoing Sibel Edmonds Gladio B conversation, we ask the question: Who is at the top of the pyramid. We look beyond the usual suspects and follow the money back to the industries and lobbies whose existence depends on the perpetuation of boogeymen enemies.

See Previous Gladio Episodes Here:

Part One – Sibel Edmonds on NATO, Terrorism, 9/11 and Drug Running

Part Two – Sibel Edmonds on Gladio B, Protected Terrorists and Stifled Investigations

Part Three – Sibel Edmonds on Turkey, the Hood Event, Israel and Gladio B

Part Four – Sibel Edmonds on Gladio Protected Drug Running and Money Laundering

Part Five – http://www.corbettreport.com/sibel-edmonds-answers-your-questions-on-gladio-b/

SHOW NOTES:

10 companies profiting the most from war

The 25 Biggest Defense Companies In America

Graph of US Military Spending Since 1962

The American Turkish Council: US Association Helps Create New World Order

Sibel Edmonds Case: Richard Perle continues criminal enterprise, MSM still silent

Guardian Exposes West-Jordan-Syria Axis … But Only 15 Months Late

American Judas – Synopsizing Sibel Edmonds: The Evolution of Operation Gladio Part One

Synopsizing Sibel Edmonds: The Evolution of Operation Gladio Part Two


This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.

Comments

  1. Dear Sibel, Thank you for telling the stirring story about when your Dad took you to the hospital. He must have been a very special person. I will pass this story on to my students when we discuss current events as it really strikes home. Chuck

  2. avatar tonywicher says:

    If the nexus of power is in the revolving door between government and the military-industrial complex, then I would think Cheney would be a major example of such a nexus, since he was in government since the seventies as both Vice President and Secretary of Defense and he was also CEO of Halliburton. What would be more of a nexus than that? The Bush nexus between government and the MIC goes back about 90 years. War and oil is all the Bushes have ever done for a living. So who does Cheney and the Bushes answer to? Who is higher on the pyramid? I think financial institutions, banks are the controlling power, and I think the oldest, most senior such institutions going back several hundred years have their origin in Britain, institutions like the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank (HSBC) that ran the opium wars against China in the nineteenth century, and continues to run hundreds of billions of dollars worth of heroin today.

  3. Here’s a video called “The CIA Controls Al Qaeda” that discusses 80′s and 93 WTC Bombing. Was just forwarded to me – haven’t watched completely through yet.

  4. avatar tonywicher says:

    If you look at the U.S. government, who, really, is the power? Is it Obama or Brennan? I think it’s likely that Brennan controls Obama, and Brennan answers to whom? He has longstanding links with Saudi intelligence, people like Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who is best seen as a British agent and a conduit between the Bushes and Brennan and Obama and those who give them the orders for events like 9/11 as part of their long-term plan for world empire. Also, who does Bernanke or Geithner take orders from? Not from Obama, that’s for sure. It is these financiers that are the real power, the money power. But Bernanke and Geithner are just junior members of the world oligarchy, disposable clerks, practically, from the standpoint of financial institutions hundreds of years old.

  5. Hi Sibel, I have your book and read every word of it. In fact, the book is on a book case, and everyday I see it, comming in the door! (your pretty face on the book, right there… front and center!!

    I sent you a letter in which I said: please delete any and all of my comments, after time, if they are in anyway obnoctious! As… in my experience… I have the capacity to make.. such comments.. aforsaid: obnoctious.

    Now, do to my thinking that you: Sibel, have failed to contact me with regard to the small amount… I am thinking: that possibly, that I am on some hold or under some kind of… thing.

    I saved my money for a lot of years… i didn’t play, I didn’t go and fuck off at the parlors and casinos, so I got more than a million. And you know what? I don’t think I will get any of it!

    NOw if you know anything about what I mean…! What I mean is: well I will tell you what I mean about it… if you ever contact me… you are sure able to contact me, by email. by cell phone. (you have my # in your thing on the whatchmacallit… EN

  6. Soo Sorry… Geesus, i must have been having some kind of… moment….

    But Sibel, even though I had the moment and I sort of went off the rails there…

    I am a true supportor of you, I read the book from start to finish, i mean I read every page of the book, because I found it interesting and well written! Sibel is a heroine!

  7. avatar tonywicher says:

    Xicha, the video is excellent. This is all material I am familiar with, but very clearly laid out. Thanks, I will distribute it.

  8. avatar tonywicher says:

    I think Xicha’s video adds another dimension to Sibel’s analysis and I think it does show that the alliance between the CIA and Islamic militants goes back farther than Siserluk. I think Sibel is basing her approach on what she found out about Turkish involvement as an FBI translator, but the alliance with Islamic militants goes back to the Carter Adminstration and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan to “give the Soviets their Vietnam” by using Afghan mujaheddin. Historically, it goes back even farther to the fact that Saudi Arabia was (and really still is) a British colony and the Al-Sauds are to begin with an illegitimate dynasty put in place by the British after World War 1. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE etc. are now financing these Islamic militants against Syria, Iran, Africa and central Asia as ordered by their imperial masters.

  9. Thanks, tonywicher. While I appreciate your comment, I think it colors Sibel’s analysis as either incomplete, naive, or making a big deal out of business as usual.

    Sibel and James do talk about the history of using religion/extremists this way previously. What the transition to Gladio Plan B represents is the institutionalization of such a program in the Pentagon and the huge infrastructure built via Gulen. There was a conscious decision to move to this strategy, using the previous examples as inspiration and proof of concept.

  10. avatar tonywicher says:

    Xicha,

    Sorry, I don’t intend to minimize Sibel’s contribution, which is invaluable. Let me explain myself as follows: Sibel does not want to focus too narrowly on 9/11 itself, and exactly what happened on that day, but wants to understand the whole political and historical context within which it took place. The video you posted offers further political and historical context. My own investigations for the past eight years, before I discovered BFP, were very much along the lines presented in that video, which connects a lot of dots between the formation of Al Qaeda by Brzezinski and the CIA during the Carter administration through the eighties and the 90′s up to 9/11. I had not seen it before and I really liked it. As I said, the information was not new to me but it brings it all together in a very clear way. On the other hand, all the Turkish connections involving Gulen and Chatli that Sibel talks about have been new and fascinating to me. There is only one truth, but everybody approaches it differently, everybody has their own perspective. We approach the truth from different angles, but we are closing in on the same thing.

    On the institutionalizing of Gladio as a “Gladio Plan B Department” in the Pentagon. I believe such a department does exist. Sibel does not name it, but I have a hypothesis. My theory is that it is what is known as the JSOC, the Joint Strategic Operations Command. My reason for thinking this is that it differs from all other commend centers such as CENTCOM, AFRICOM, etc. in the Pentagon in that its orders do not come through the regular chain of command. Normally the chain of commend goes from the President to the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and from there to the commanders in the field. But the JSOC has a stovepipe directly to the White House. The White House can give orders to the JSOC bypassing the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs. This is what happened with Benghazi, where there was a JSOC operation going on that got out of control, and when Ambassador Stevens was attacked, Panetta, Petraeus and the JCS was caught flat-footed. The JSOC is commanded directly by Obama and Brennan. In 2001 it was commanded by Cheney. Remember Cheney’s “private assassination squad” exposed by Seymour Hersch: http://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2009/03/investigative-reporter-seymour-hersh-describes-executive-assassination-ring
    Also there is a more recent article by Jeremy Scahill on the same subject:
    http://www.thenation.com/blog/160332/jsoc-black-ops-force-took-down-bin-laden#. I would only amend this article to say that the JSOC is the force that allegedly took down Bin Laden, since Bin Laden died in 2001-2002, and the whole 2011 event was staged. But what the JSOC really did do, I think, was to first drone and then blow up the World Trade Center and the accounting offices of the Pentagon on 9/11/2001. I’m just putting this hypothesis out there for people to think about. It fits all the facts that I know.

  11. Very interesting, tonywicher. Note, Sibel mentioned that it was the exact same physical office as was used for Gladio A, if that helps.

    Do you know when JSOC was created? Did it have had a previous name?

  12. Ben Swann – Full Disclosure: Al Qaeda in Syria, the Story You Haven’t Heard?

  13. Russia is absolutely pissed about the BTC line going through Georgia to Turkey also LUKoil sold off all its shares in the ACG consortium, making it completely Russian free.

    The Government did not meet the Taliban in Texas to discuss a oil line through Afghanistan, Unocal did. It was their own investors that squashed the deal. The government has zero interest in any lines going that direction where they would end up in China. The 11 year war in Afghanistan ensures none will be made. You can bet the farm the “Islamist” will be hitting the new IP line Iran and Pakistan made which also is aimed at China. China financed it on Pakistan’s side of the line and built the port themselves.

  14. Russia is absolutely livid about the BTC line going through Georgia to Turkey also LUKoil sold off all its shares in the ACG consortium, making it completely Russian free.

    The Government did not meet the Taliban in Texas to discuss a oil line through Afghanistan, Unocal did. It was their own investors that squashed the deal. The government has zero interest in any lines going that direction where they would end up in China. The 11 year war in Afghanistan ensures none will be made. You can bet the farm the “Islamist” will be hitting the new IP line Iran and Pakistan made which also is aimed at China. China financed it on Pakistan’s side of the line and built the port themselves.

  15. http://mediaroots.org/post-911-how-we-all-became-boiled-frogs.php

    Media Roots has an excellent podcast on the propaganda, specifically “agitation propaganda” surrounding 9/11, put together in a timeline.

Speak Your Mind