WikiLeaks, Hillary-Gulen Intimate Ties & How the Clintons Gave Birth to Mullah Gulen’s Terrorist Network

In this episode of Spotlight with Sibel and Spiro we discuss the notorious USA-based Mullah Fethullah Gulen and Operation Gladio B in light of Wikileaks’ recent announcement that they plan to release a new batch of e-mails exposing the intimate ties between Hillary Clinton and Gulen’s 25+ Billion shady network. Sibel Edmonds explains how Fethullah Gulen was brought into the United States during the Clinton Administration, and how Bill Clinton’s White House, the State Department and the Justice Department’s Janet Reno provided the infamous mullah and his terrorism-heroin operations with blanket immunity and protection. We also take a look at Clinton’s hand-picked handlers, Graham Fuller and Mark Grossman, selected to manage and direct Gulen’s cells in the U.S. and abroad.

*Follow us here at Newsbud Twitter

*Subscribe here at BFP-Newsbud YouTube Channel

Show Notes

Sibel Edmonds- Turkish Intel Chief Exposes CIA-Gulen Terror Operation in Central Asia

YouTube-Corbett Report (Video): Sibel Edmonds on Gladio B – Part I

Sibel Edmonds’ State Secrets Privilege Gallery

YouTube- Corbett Report (Video): Who is Graham Fuller?

YouTube-Lew Rockwell : The Boston Bombing, the CIA, Graham Fuller & the US Empire

YouTube- Corbett Report: Turkish Coup Plotter Fethullah Gulen

Wikileaks: Clinton-Gulen E-mails

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.

Comments

  1. Thanks for your great reports!

    Small clarification:

    Bill Clinton’s video address is to the “Third Annual Friendship Dinner at Waldorf Astoria Hotel, New York” held in September 2008:
    https://tukishnews.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/gul-meets-with-presidents-at-tcc%E2%80%99s-friendship-dinner/#more-32

    The Clinton video was inserted just before Sibel saying:
    “So as you can see, these people, Clinton, Clinton administration were already working with [Gülen] dating back to the 90’s”

    So to clarify: That doesn’t actually follow from the video. As far as I understand, the arguments pertaining to the 90’s are: Mark Grossman being appointed by the Clintons, the timing of Gülen’s move to the US and what Sibel has witnessed at the FBI: The files implicating Gülen, and Clinton-Reno relegating those to the never-to-be-disclosed counterintelligence dept.

  2. VoiceOf Arabi says:

    Well done Newsbud team. I really enjoyed this balance, professional report. keep up the good work.

    I would also like to weigh in with some knowledge concerning religion that i know a lot about, Islam.

    We all know that all religions got hijacked all through the ages, some times by kings and queens, and some other times, by power hungry individuals wishing to control the masses. Islam is just one of these religions.

    Religion, including Islam, is nothing more the a vessel to help you navigate through the river of life. It is a personal small boat as oppose to a ocean liner. (by that i mean it is a personal relation between you and god, and not meant to be used to control the masses and get them to “submit” to your personal or kings will).

    Islam was hijacked during the early days by the Umayyad Caliphs 661AD only 29 years after prophet Mohammed death, and was turned into a hereditary system, using religion, after manipulating all the oral text to support their views.

    This happened many times over, and the last significant time was during the afghan war, when the USA used Islam to fight the Communist (by twisting some of the translation of the text). Previous to this, it was during 1928 while the British Empire created the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Mr. Gulen is the new incarnation (or if you like, version 2.0) of Muslim Brotherhood, again to reach and fight for the interest of NATO.

    But most importantly… the reason this is happening is… Majority of Muslim leaders from around the world and from all the different sects are too stupid and too power hungry themselves to awake the Muslim individuals and as a group to this major threat that is destroying humanity and Islam in one sweep.

    • Hi VoiceOf Arabi,

      is there specific evidence pointing to the Umayyad Caliphs having manipulated the oral texts?

      I spent quite some time years ago looking into political machinations leading to the final form of the new testament in 325 AD. Quite fascinating, I can recommend “Who wrote the new testament?” by Burton Mack. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22who+wrote+the+new+testament%3F%22+mack&t=ffsb&ia=products

      • VoiceOf Arabi says:

        Hi Olivier,

        Most of Islamic history was transmitted orally until after the rise of the Abbasid Caliphate (750AD). So, it makes it very hard to provide specific written evidence as nothing was written down for almost 200 years after the birth of Islam.

        But, you know things were manipulated as contradictions start showing up, For example, Muslim Caliphs should be chosen from the people (shura council), but since the Umayyad family was a ruling family before Islam came into the picture, they decided to return to hereditary Caliphs system, i.e. bring it back to the family, and they issued new (oral) text to justify that, and claimed that “the prophet said that at some point”, and off course, it is someones word against the Caliphs word.

        We all have heard of the phrase/game “Chinese whispers”, and we all know what happens to a message in that game… now imaging if this had to be very very long text and life biography of someone, and it does not get committed to paper until 200 years later…

        The real big problem is, the majority of Muslim leaders around the world have not grown up and taken personal responsibility to admit that this text could be heavily manipulated. In fact, they are adamant that not a single letter was changed ever (go figure).

        • VoiceOf Arabi says:

          Hi again Olivier,

          I just wanted to add, Shia’a and Sunni divide started at about the same time the Umayyad family hijacked Islam and converted it to hereditary Caliphs system. Basically, the prophets descendants (and their supporters) said, if this is going to be hereditary, then the prophets family is more deserving of the rule… Off course, you will not find this in the popular text, as it makes it a pity struggle for power instead of divine and holy.

  3. Now I know what GLADIO “b” stands for.
    bill.
    All coming into focus now. The Clinton criminal rope unraveling behind them almost as fast as they move to cover it up. Thanks to all you whistleblowers. Your courage gives us ammunition. Julian Assange. Sibel Edmonds. Extraordinary people.

  4. Hi Sibel,

    You were quite circumspect about praising Assange only for this particular leak instance, implying that there were earlier events that you didn’t like too much. I don’t remeber exactly, are you referring to (Assange’s involvement in) the Snowden leaks or something else?

    P.S. if we believe these Canadian archivers, then the actual nr of Snowden documents released to the public is 7 + 114 + 5 + 2 + 8 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 20 + 2 + 2 + 96 + 91 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 5 + 15 + 343 + 1 + 44 + 52 + 3 = 822

    https://snowdenarchive.cjfe.org/greenstone/cgi-bin/library.cgi?e=d-00100-00—off-0snowden1–00-2—-0-10-0—0—0direct-10—-4——-0-1l–10-en-50—50-about—01-3-1-00-00–4–0–0-0-01-10-0utfZz-8-00&a=d&cl=CL2

  5. Where does @wikileaks actually announce an upcoming Gülen-Clinton batch? The tweet at the beginning of the video refers to previously disclosed emails, and the Gülen-Clinton relationship that was inferred from those. Or do you mean the fact that wikileaks went through the trouble of making a wikileaks-Gülen picture?

    Most of the Gülen-referencing documents at wikileaks.org come from the Stratfor series by the way:
    https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=G%C3%BClen&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&order_by=most_relevant#results

  6. CuChulainn says:

    For the first time, the US Army acknowledges that the Islamic State’s caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, spent most of his time under US detention in the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, according to a new report.

    Through a Freedom of Information Act records request, the Intercept was able to confirm with the US Army that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), had been imprisoned in a special high-profile section at the Abu Ghraib prison in the Iraqi city of the same name, from February to October 2004.

    On October 13 of that year, al-Baghdadi was transferred to Camp Bucca, as were many other Abu Ghraib inmates. Bucca had previously been reported as the sole facility where the IS caliph was held, but according to this new report, al-Baghdadi actually was there for less than two months. He was given an “unconditional release” on December 9.

    https://www.rt.com/usa/357222-isis-abu-bakr-al-baghdadi-abu-ghraib-torture-prison/

  7. now that the dust has cleared, i wonder if Sibel was the target of a psyop to undermine her credibility? the whole coup looks like a psyop on Turkey to gain credibility & power for Erdogan. is the Gülen movement now dispensible? to what extent will it continue to function in and out of Turkey?

    http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/09/24/us-turkey-lurch-world-war-syria.html
    Four weeks on from the US and Turkey launching the incursion into Syrian territory, Ankara says that it is expanding its occupation.
    Earlier this week, Erdogan said his troops would push further south into Syria to take a total area of 5,000 square kms – about five times the area already under its present control. In Orwellian jargon, the Turkish-US forces are labelling the annexed territory as «safe zones». Exactly to whom this is being made «safe» for is not yet clear.
    While in New York City, the Turkish leader urged the US to step up its military cooperation with Ankara to, as he put it, «finish off Daesh [ISIS]» in Syria. Erdogan is pushing Washington even harder to get onboard with the long-held Turkish objective of setting up «no fly zones» in the occupied northern Syrian territory.
    Erdogan also hinted that he expected a Clinton presidency to be more gung-ho about escalating military involvement, and in particular implementing no fly zones. Hillary Clinton has already said that she would take a more hostile line towards Syria and Russia, going as far as declaring she would deploy military force to oust President Bashar al-Assad.
    It is notable that Erdogan is making his appeals solely to Washington for greater military intervention «to finish off Daesh» in Syria. Surely, if Turkey was serious about this stated objective then it would be entreating Russia to join forces, given that Russia has shown itself to be the most effective military power against the terror groups, after it was requested to intervene by the Syrian government last year.
    That Erdogan wants to go it alone with the US on his supposed «anti-terror» mission in Syria points to an ulterior agenda. That agenda is nothing less than war on Syria.

  8. Akihito Mekata says:

    Hi, as I am Japanese and I may not understand English fully, what had been said in various information is very critical not only to USA citizen but also for entire world. And I wonder why such information were not send to presidential candidate Mr.Trump because this information of Bill Clinton’s Speech will reveal crime of Secretary Clinton and former president Bill Clinton. I am not 100% sure but at least Mr. Trump is not on establishment side so that if such information were fed to Mr. Trump, it will have great impact on three (3) presidential debate at three (3) university. Even non English speaker like me can understand incredible evilness of both Clinton which make me feel utterly disgusting and sick.

Speak Your Mind