Hastert & Emanuel: Who Made Hay While The Sun Shined?
“Lobbyists make more money than Congressmen because lobbyists write more laws than we do.” – Congressman Ron Paul (TX)
Government work can inspire a certain image, particularly if you are still swayed by idealistic grade-school texts that extolled the work of ‘public servants.’ These are people working not for themselves, primarily, but for a greater good. Government workers accept a discount from what they could earn in the private sector, because they care about the public. We owe them our gratitude.
Well, some of them, to be sure.
In economics, there is a fundamental principle called ‘rationality.’ A lot of students tend to rebel against this notion, and it has some critics from the behavioral finance profession as well. But I still remember the day one of my favorite professors in economics, facing heat from students on this score, stepped back and defined rationality simply as ‘self-interested, purposive behavior.’ People don’t intentionally try to harm themselves, even if they don’t always make consistent or good decisions. People try to pursue their own self-interest, to try to make themselves better off. In a world without significant government intervention, this tendency usually promotes cooperation among buyers and sellers, and the common good as well.
Does public service make for a vow of poverty? Our public servants are people, like the rest of us. As a general tendency, we all tend to pursue our self-interest. And in the public service world, some of the most ambitious, loudest champions about what is good for the rest of us are also intensely self-interested. When self-interest combines with the pursuit of profit through government intervention, public servants can make themselves better off while leaving the rest of us worse off.
Assuming that policymakers pursue their own self interest is a central tenet of the public choice school of economics. The “Chicago School” of regulation (the University of Chicago economics department, not the City of Chicago) similarly calls for us to suspend any enduring belief that public servants are always unselfish. And when public servants serve themselves, well-organized special interest groups can more easily capture regulatory policy and drive it to their own benefit. In turn, the revolving door, with our servants moving seamlessly between government and the regulated, and back again, can be a very lucrative business.
Lobbying can also lead government policy to generate results the opposite of what is being advertised. For example, anti-trust policy can actually make consumers worse off, particularly if well-organized producers run the show. Government financial regulation can actually destabilize the financial system, if public guarantees spawn moral hazard and gambling with the public purse. And the resulting crises can become a lever for taking more money from the many, in order to stabilize and cement the positions of the favored few. Read more
In the
On November 1, the
In the
Chicagoans can be thankful for some prosecutors, but the “City that Works” and the state and federal government functions dealing with it haven’t earned a presumption of innocence. A careful, cautious and even cynical perspective is warranted when considering the prospects for reform under new Mayor Rahm Emanuel, especially in light of the strong ties that helped lay the basis for his political career in recent decades.
Chicago has a lot of strengths, along with a deserved, well, reputation. The City of Big Shoulders? Perhaps. But legal and illegal corruption have long greased the wheels in the City That Works. Chicago is joined at the hip with the State of Illinois, with no shortage of its own symptoms. Paul Powell, an Illinois Secretary of State who passed away while in office in 1970, just before $800,000 in cash (nearly $5 million in today’s dollars, given the inflation since then) was found stuffed in a shoebox and other places in his hotel room, along with 49 cases of whiskey. George Ryan, a former governor still in jail on corruption convictions. And they don’t seem to learn. Rod Blagojevich was elected to the governor’s seat after Ryan, and Blagojevich now stands to be sentenced following his conviction on corruption charges earlier this year.

A 2009 article/interview published in 
We all know the relevance and importance of a solid and sound background check when it comes to our elected and appointed officials and commissioners. Of course we all want to know about that big ‘conflict of interest’ factor. Okay, not all of us, especially not our MSM stenographers, but a few independent researchers and journalists here and there, and the rest of us among the ‘active and inquiring’ crowd. So let’s call this ‘chasing the chicken’ for now.’ Are you with me so far? Just hang in there and you’ll find out what I’m talking about, or at least I hope you will
Fortunately one independent reporter researched and
I am starting with Rahm Emanuel since he prompted this piece on Chicago Politics’ Figureheads in Corruption. I know what you’re thinking, and no I am not going to walk down the same path and talk about the creepy odd personalities making even a creepier and odder couple. Catch my drift? While the outcome of that marriage may end up interestingly, the marriage is not as advertised. It is not far left with far right, but purely and simply a good example of in-breeding: when the byproducts of the same establishment couple with each other…In ordinary life the off-spring sum up the result. In the murky, smoke and mirrors, basically plain swampy and dirty world of partisan politics the outcome is what you watch on Fox TV, or the like.
While dictionaries and encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, provide a thorough definition and description of
Dennis Hastert, a Republican member of the US House of Representatives from 1987 until 2007, represented Illinois’ 14th Congressional District, and served as the Speaker of the House from 1999 to 2007.


