Podcast Show #53

The Boiling Frogs Presents Paul Thompson-Part I

BFP Podcast Logo

This is Part I of our three-part one-of-a-kind interview series with author and researcher Paul Thompson. For additional background information please visit the complete 9/11 Timeline Investigative Project at HistoryCommons.Org and Richard Clarke’s interview by John Duffy and Ray Nowosielski at SecrecyKills.Com.

Paul Thompson joins us to discuss the latest revelations by former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke and his explosive allegations against three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – accusing them of knowingly withholding intelligence about two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, who had entered the United States more than a year before the attacks. He provides us with the most comprehensive history and context to date on Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, who hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 with three other terrorists and flew the jetliner directly into the Pentagon killing 189 people. Mr. Thompson takes us through a mind-boggling journey through the Yemen Hub, the highly critical Malaysia Summit, Thailand, USS Cole bombing, CIA’s Alec Station, NSA, FBI and beyond!

ptPaul Thompson is the author of the Terror Timeline, a compilation of over 5,000 reports and articles concerning the September 11, 2001 attacks. His research in the field has garnered over 100 radio and TV interviews. Mr. Thompson holds a psychology degree from Stanford University obtained in 1990. For the complete 9/11 Timeline Investigative Project visit HistoryCommons.Org

Here is our guest Paul Thompson unplugged!

***Subscribing Members must be logged in to listen to the audio

FB Like

Share This

This site depends….

This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING and/or DONATING.


  1. Thank you Sibel and Paul for doing this.

  2. He really is the most dangerous man on the planet re: 9/11.

  3. The question is are they really THAT stupid or was it on purpose. It was on purpose. They worked together in past in the Balkan and in Afghanistan. Look at how Anwar al-Awlaki had dinner at the white house! Al Qaeda is the US’s own modern privateers.

  4. won’t play on my android phone. download used to work. is that gone as part of the new subscription plan?

  5. It does stand out that Al Qaeda was completely compromised and it would seem little would not be known of their operations at the time of 911.

  6. Great interview. I’m still waiting for POGO to pick this up. Should I hold my breath?

  7. So far this plays as supportive to the official myth, that is that the hijackers flew the planes into the WTC towers. In contrast, I suggest the hijackers were patsies, ala Lee Harvey Oswald, and that trails were left pointing to the hijackers as the culprits. Of course certain factions of the intelligence agencies had to protect the hijackers from apprehension lest the entire myth be unraveled. So far, I’m not impressed at all.

  8. This interview discussed such things as the United States relationship with “Al-Qaeda” after the Afghanistan/Russia War. That goes against the “official myth” of 9/11 which says any relationship that we had during the war, ended after the war. This interview discussed foreknowledge of the attacks. That goes against the “official myth” of 9/11 which says there were “no warnings,” and “no idea” of any kind that what happened, would happen. This interview discusses the idea of criminality as opposed to “incompetence.” That goes against the “official myth” of 9/11 which says everyone was incompetent (and yet, no one was held accountable for their incompetence, and instead, people were rewarded or promoted. Accountability applies to both criminality and incompetence).

    When you have witnesses in airports saying they saw the hijackers, when you have purchased airplane tickets from the hijackers for those flights, when you have radio communications from within the planes talking about “we have some planes” (that people can theorize about the legitimacy of until the end of time, and never prove that they were fake), when you have martyr videos of the hijackers, it’s ludicrous to say that something doesn’t deserve attention at all simply because it discusses the hijackers. There is more incriminating information WITH the hijackers in the picture. I don’t understand why people want to take them OUT of the picture… Well, I would understand why some would want to take them out of the picture, knowing how much incriminating information exists about them with them in it.

  9. Here is an interview from Dr. Michael Parenti talking about the JFK assassination. During this talk, he mentions how important the story of the “Patsies” is.


  10. Funny thing Paul, I don’t think I realized I was working on a book for publication…

Speak Your Mind